Second Circuit· 4/4/2006
Handberry v. Thompson
Citations
- 446 F.3d 335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a challenge to the adequacy of defendants’ provision of educational services concerned the effects of actions by government officials on the lives of persons confined to prison as provided by the PLRA
- “IDEA exhaustion in the instant case is excused under the futility exception for challenges addressing systemic issues”
- discussing circumstances leading to waiver of the non-exhaustion defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Steffey v. OrmanTenth Circuit· 2006-08-30· cited 530×
- Bryant Ex Rel. D.B. v. New York State Education DepartmentSecond Circuit· 2012-08-20· cited 223×
- J.W. ex rel. J.E.W. v. Fresno Unified School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2010-10-19· cited 83×
- Parent/Professional Advocacy League v. City of SpringfieldFirst Circuit· 2019-08-08· cited 81×
- Marino v. City University of New YorkE.D. New York· 2014-05-09· cited 53×
- Mr. P v. W. Hartford Bd. of Educ.Second Circuit· 2018-03-23· cited 45×
- V.W. ex rel. Williams v. ConwayN.D. New York· 2017-02-22· cited 35×
- J.S. v. Scarsdale Union Free School DistrictS.D. New York· 2011-11-18· cited 27×
- Alleyne v. New York State Education DepartmentN.D. New York· 2010-02-24· cited 11×
- Davis v. ProudE.D. New York· 2014-03-05· cited 10×
- Marshall v. N.Y.S. Pub. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n, Inc.W.D. New York· 2017-12-04· cited 9×
- Murray v. GoordN.D. New York· 2009-10-19· cited 7×
- J.S. v. New York City Department of EducationS.D. New York· 2015-05-06· cited 7×
- Horton v. WestlingN.D. New York· 2018-02-15· cited 7×
- Nelson v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, NYW.D. New York· 2007-07-02· cited 4×
- Demmerick Brown v. Karen StapletonFourth Circuit· 2025-07-01· cited 4×
- C.W.L. & E.L. ex rel. C.L. v. Pelham Union Free School DistrictS.D. New York· 2015-12-09· cited 2×
- November Team, Inc. v. New York State Joint Commission on Public EthicsS.D. New York· 2017-01-11· cited 1×
- Johnson v. RowleySecond Circuit· 2009-06-11
- Mr. & Mrs. P. v. West Hartford Bd. of Educ.Second Circuit· 2018-03-23
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 4,960×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,877×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,581×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 3,014×
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 2,739×
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court· 1976-11-15· cited 1,394×
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 703×
- Johnny Richardson v. Glenn S. Goord, C. Coyne, Dr. Mathew, Auburn Correctional Facility, Dick Hunter, Auburn Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 2003-10-22· cited 236×
- Lawrence Johnson v. Ronald Testman, Lonnie JamesSecond Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 209×
- Hemphill v. New YorkSecond Circuit· 2004-08-18· cited 185×
- Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of EducationSecond Circuit· 2005-02-02· cited 165×
- Polera v. Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School DistrictSecond Circuit· 2002-04-29· cited 148×
- Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-12-07· cited 104×
- Sealed v. SealedSecond Circuit· 2003-06-13· cited 88×
- Kapps v. WingSecond Circuit· 2005-04-04· cited 84×
- Clarkson v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1995-06-16· cited 79×
Other cases named Handberry v. Thompson
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.