Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/2/2007
Dickens v. State
Citations
- 927 A.2d 32
- 175 Md. App. 231
- 34 A.L.R. 6th 723
- 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- threatening text messages received by victim on cell phone were properly authenticated when circumstantial evidence provided adequate proof message was sent by defendant
- threatening text messages received by victim on cell phone were properly authenticated when circumstantial evidence provided adequate proof message was sent by defendant
- finding adequate foundation with direct evidence that message came from number associated with defendant's phone and circumstantial evidence in the messages' content and context
- threatening text messages received by victim on cell phone contained details few people would know and were sent from phone in defendant’s possession at the time
- threatening text messages received by victim on cell phone contained details few people would know and were sent from phone in defendant’s possession at the time
- reviewing whether text messages saved on a cellular telephone were properly authenticated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salmon, Adkins, Meredith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-09-16· cited 369×
- Hape v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-03-31· cited 124×
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-10-25· cited 68×
- Rodriguez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2012-04-05· cited 62×
- Manuel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2011-08-31· cited 60×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-28· cited 44×
- State v. EleckConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-09· cited 33×
- Donati v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-01-29· cited 26×
- Travis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-26· cited 22×
- State v. DamperCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-03-02· cited 20×
- Tate v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-27· cited 18×
- Disciplinary Board v. AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-01-12· cited 14×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-31· cited 10×
- Winston, Mayhew & Cannon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-02-02· cited 10×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 6×
- Walls v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-27· cited 6×
- Carpenter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-01· cited 2×
- Sykes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-11-18
- Light v. EsbenshadeLebanon County Court of Common Pleas· 2013-12-10
- Reddick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-10-31
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-13· cited 132×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-07· cited 101×
- Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-05· cited 81×
- Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-09-28· cited 80×
- Tender v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-01-09· cited 68×
- Gilliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-25· cited 64×
- United States v. SafavianDistrict of Columbia· 2006-05-23· cited 61×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-05-11· cited 51×
- Massimo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-08-05· cited 33×
- Hardesty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-12-09· cited 33×
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-13· cited 26×
- Price v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-15· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.