Skip to main content
· 10/8/2013

HCI Investors, LLC v. Fox

Citations

  • 412 S.W.3d 424
  • 2013 WL 5525841
  • 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State may appeal an order that “modifies a judgment by imposing shock probation.”
  • State’s appeal of trial court’s grant of shock probation stayed proceedings until appeal was resolved when appellate court’s mandate issued
  • “We hold that the State may appeal an order that modifies a judgment by imposing shock probation.”
  • “We hold that the State may appeal an order that modifies a judgment by imposing shock probation.”
  • “When a trial court grants shock probation under the provisions of Article 42.12 § 6(a), it suspends the execution, rather than the imposition, of the sentence.”
  • “[T]he State may appeal an order that modifies a judgment by imposing 1 The trial court assessed 5 years’ confinement for each third-degree felony (counts 1–4), and 2 years’ confinement for each state-jail felony (counts 5–6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardwick, Martin, Pfeiffer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.