Miller v. Foulston, Siefkin, Powers & Eberhardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing benefit as “retirement benefit” where, to qualify, partners must satisfy age, longevity, or disability requirements
• even without a severability clause, \[a] contract that contains valid and invalid provisions in which the lawful provisions can be easily severed will be upheld as to the lawful portion\
• “Plaintiff had to choose between retiring, including stopping the practice of law and receiving over $190,000 in retirement benefits, or continuing the practice of law, in which case he lost retirement benefits.”
• former partner suing for wrongful discharge and fraud
• former partner suing for wrongful discharge and fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).