Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 9/17/1999

Bear U.S.A., Inc. v. Kim

Citations

  • 71 F. Supp. 2d 237
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14434
  • 1999 WL 731655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enjoining third-party manufacturer who acted “in active concert” with defendant bound by previous court order from distributing infringing products after being informed of court order
  • “[E]vidence of third patty registrations, in contrast to evidence of third party usage in the marketplace, is not persuasive evidence that a mark is weak.”
  • one incident of customer attempting to return defendant’s product to plaintiffs store characterized as “minimal” but favoring plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bear U.S.A., Inc. v. Kim

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.