Arrow Fastener Co., Inc. v. The Stanley Works

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant's use of a six-digit model number that contained the symbol \T50\ was not confusingly similar to plaintiff's use of the mark, \Model T-50\
• concluding that defendant’s use of a six-digit model number that contained the symbol “T50” was not confusingly similar to plaintiffs use of the mark, “Model T — 50”
• holding that such marks can be protected without the need to demonstrate that “the name and the business have become synonymous in the mind of the public”
• holding that such marks can be protected without the need to demonstrate that “the name and the business have become synonymous in the mind of the public”
• stating that a finding of good faith may be supported by the defendant’s selection of a mark that reveals the product’s attributes
• stating that a finding of good faith may be supported by the defendant's selection of a mark that reveals the product's attributes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).