Schering Corporation v. Pfizer Inc. And Ucb Pharma, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that surveys are admissible if five requirements are met: “trustworthiness, materiality, probative importance, the interests of justice, and notice”
• holding that \errors in methodology ... properly go only to the weight of the evidence\
• concluding that mental impressions with which an audience is left can be relevant, and are sometimes even necessary, to establish what a defendant is implying in a challenged representation in a Lanham Act case
• observing that a hearsay statement “need not be free” of all “risk to be admitted” under the residual hearsay exception
• noting that the party challenging the survey evidence actually requested one of the surveys
• noting that trustworthiness is a requirement for the admission of survey evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).