· 2/28/1961
Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics Corporation
Citations
- 287 F.2d 492
- 4 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 81
- 128 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 411
- 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- laying out a non-exclusive, multi-factor analysis for assessing likelihood of confusion
- in determining the propriety of injunctive relief, “the Court may have to take still other variables into account”
- “Even this extensive catalogue does not exhaust the possibilities—the court may have to take still other variables into account.”
- “Here plaintiff’s mark is a strong one . . . ”
- listing “proximity of the products” as a factor to consider
- rejecting a variety of legal defenses in a similar case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Medina, Friendly, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.