Skip to main content
· 2/28/1961

Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics Corporation

Citations

  • 287 F.2d 492
  • 4 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 81
  • 128 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 411
  • 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • laying out a non-exclusive, multi-factor analysis for assessing likelihood of confusion
  • in determining the propriety of injunctive relief, “the Court may have to take still other variables into account”
  • “Even this extensive catalogue does not exhaust the possibilities—the court may have to take still other variables into account.”
  • “Here plaintiff’s mark is a strong one . . . ”
  • listing “proximity of the products” as a factor to consider
  • rejecting a variety of legal defenses in a similar case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Medina, Friendly, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.