Baugher v. Gates Rubber Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s spoliation claim, to the extent Missouri would recognize such a claim, was premature because plaintiff could not establish any harm due to the fact that plaintiff had not lost the underlying lawsuit
• noting that Missouri does not recognize a tort for intentional spoliation of evidence
• noting that tortious interference requires proof of an “intentional wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).