Petrik v. Monarch Printing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff staled claim for discharge in retaliation for disclosing to management discrepancies in company’s financial records
• recognizing retaliatory discharge when employee reports criminal conduct to supervisors instead of law enforcement personnel
• noting that plaintiff therein complained that officers or employees of the defendant “might be involved in violation of the criminal laws of Illinois.”
• recognizing retaliatory discharge when employee reports criminal conduct to supervisors instead of law enforcement personnel
• allowing retaliatory discharge action by employee who reported discrepancy in corporation’s financial records which he believed may have been due to criminal conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).