· 7/31/1986
Hazen v. Municipality of Anchorage
Citations
- 718 P.2d 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the tort on grounds that a potential lawsuit is a valuable probable expectancy
- recognizing \new tort\ of intentional interference with prospective civil action by spoliation of evidence although issue was not raised by the parties and \was neither briefed nor discussed at oral argument\
- recognizing a cause of action for intentional spoliation of evidence by a third party
- recognizing a cause of action in tort based upon spoliation of evidence
- recognizing the tort of intentional spoliation of evidence by a party
- recognizing the tort of intentional spoliation of evidence by a party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Witz, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Moore, Burke, Compton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.