District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/17/2006
Bartee v. State
Citations
- 922 So. 2d 1065
- 2006 WL 663408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 911 tapes are admissible under the spontaneous statement exception to hearsay rule, and that the Confrontation Clause was not violated where 911 calls were nontestimonial in nature as statements were not made in response to police interrogation
- holding that 911 tapes are admissible under the spontaneous statement exception to hearsay rule, and that the Confrontation Clause was not violated where 911 calls were nontestimonial in nature as statements were not made in response to police interrogation
- finding statements victim made to officers in response to questioning after incident were testimonial and that the use of statements at trial violated defendant's right to confront victim where victim was unavailable
- statements made in response to questioning by police officer who is investigating a crime were testimonial under Crawford
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monaco
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-01-18· cited 566×
- Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-20· cited 142×
- Hammon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-23· cited 107×
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-17· cited 74×
- United States v. Thomas Hinton AKA James Kirkland Thomas HintonThird Circuit· 2005-09-14· cited 70×
- State v. MacLinTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 69×
- Huckaby v. New York State Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court· 2005-10-31· cited 54×
- Herrera-Vega v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-22· cited 28×
- Stancil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 25×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-04-15· cited 18×
- Levy v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-14· cited 15×
- Manuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-16· cited 14×
- Towbridge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-13· cited 7×
- State v. OhlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-28· cited 7×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-02· cited 1×
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.