United States v. Eric Colin, United States of America v. Efrain Estrada-Nava

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches 26 and seizures applies to investigatory traffic stops.”
• “[O]ccupants of a vehicle have stand- ing to challenge on Fourth Amendment grounds an officer’s stop of their vehicle even if they have no possessory or own- ership interest in the vehicle.”
• “In sum, we conclude Carmichael did not have reasonable suspicion to stop Estrada-Nava and Colin based on lane straddling or driving under the influence. As a result, the methamphetamine he seized through the search of their vehicle should have been suppressed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).