Manuel G. Salamalekis v. Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court may defer to an agency’s position when that position “presents a reasonable construction of an ambiguous provision of * * * the agency’s regulations”
• finding Sixth Circuit opinion “not binding precedent because the opinion is unpublished.”
• both explaining that Saxman v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Saxman), 325 unpublished decisions are not binding on this court
• “If a Social Security Ruling presents a reasonable construction of an ambiguous provision of the Act or the agency’s regulations, we usually defer to the SSR.”
• “If a Social Security Ruling presents a reasonable construction of an ambiguous provision of the Act or the agency’s regulations, we usually defer to the SSR.”
• “If a Social Security Ruling presents a reasonable construction of an ambiguous provision of the Act or the agency’s regulations, we usually defer to the SSR.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).