Donald A. NEWTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a hypothetical question to a vocational expert was deficient because it simply limited a claimant to “simple jobs”
• holding when there is a finding that the claimant has deficiencies of concentration, persistence, or pace, a reference to “simple jobs” in the hypothetical is not enough to constitute inclusion of such impairments
• holding when there is a finding that the claimant has deficiencies of concentration, persistence, or pace, a reference to “simple jobs” in the hypothetical is not enough to constitute inclusion of such impairments
• limiting hypothetical to simple jobs does not account for moderate deficiencies in concentration, persistence, or pace
• holding a limitation to simple 26 27 8 The Court notes the hypothetical questions posed to the vocational experts included limitation to simple tasks with occasional detailed or complex tasks. (See Doc. 11-6 at 43, 47; Doc. 11-11 at 21
• interpreting Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, § 105, 110 Stat. 847, 852-55 (1996 Amendment)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).