Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/16/1995

Barbour v. Merrill

Citations

  • 48 F.3d 1270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for a court to award back pay, “the plaintiff bears the initial burden of establishing the value of the lost salary and benefits”
  • evaluating the plaintiff’s argument that his back pay award should reflect the salary of the individual occupying the position he would have occupied, but for discrimination
  • district court abuses its discretion if “the reasons given [do not] reasonably support the conclusion” (quoting Kickapoo Tribe, 43 F.3d at 1497)
  • issue of qualification was question of fact for jury where “the jury reasonably could have determined, from the evidence before it ... that Barbour was qualified and that private sector experience was not an absolute prerequisite”
  • “The defendant remains free to challenge the award’s amount, length, or interest rate, or to establish as an affirmative defense that the plaintiff failed to mitigate damages.”
  • “But Barbour is not necessarily entitled to the identical compensation as Rich.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.