Porter, Melvin v. Natsios, Andrew S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing two distinct frameworks for liability and characterizing the 1991 Amendments as \provid[ing] standards for mixed motive cases \
• describing two distinct frameworks for liability and characterizing the 1991 Amendments as “provid[ing] standards for mixed motive cases ”
• noting that a court’s remedy must be “consistent with the jury verdict”
• deferring 10 to reasonable regulation that operating subsidiaries of national 11 banks receive the same preemptive benefit as the parent bank
• “During the remedial stage of the proceedings, the district court may make factual findings to determine appropriate ‘make whole’ relief ... as long as the findings are consistent with the jury verdict.”
• jury charge manifested jury found mixed motives and thus district court did not err in addressing \same action\ showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).