Skip to main content

Pennington v. State

Citations

  • 821 N.E.2d 899
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 161
  • 2005 WL 267949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant waived his claim because he failed to raise proposed mitigators at the trial court level
  • holding proposed mitigating circumstances were not both significant and clearly supported in the record
  • providing that merely stating a trial court overlooked proposed mitigating circumstances “does not rise to the level of proof needed to show that the proposed mitigating circumstance is both significant and clearly supported in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Friedlander, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.