Balter v. Ethyl Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• avoiding issue of private right of action under section 17(a) because plaintiffs' \claims can be fully satisfied\ under section 10(b); recognizing conflict in circuits on whether section 17(a) permits private actions
• avoiding issue of private right of action under section 17(a) because plaintiffs’ “claims can be fully satisfied” under section 10(b); recognizing conflict in circuits on whether section 17(a) permits private actions
• private right of action under section 10(b) survives recent Supreme Court contractions of implied right of action doctrine
• “There is no such thing as a cause of action for interference which is only negligently or consequentially effected.”
• private right of action under section 10(b) survives recent Supreme Court contractions of implied right of action doctrine
• Court held that under Florida law, a party is allowed to interfere in another's business relationship where the party acts in furtherance of its own interests, such as to protect a contract.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hobson v. Wilson
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-06-08· cited 501×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-Appellees
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 156×
• K & K Management, Inc. v. Chul Woo Lee
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-16· cited 144×
• In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-07-30· cited 135×
• Fernandez v. Chardon
  First Circuit· 1982-06-08· cited 130×
• G.M. Brod & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-05-10· cited 114×
• Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1985-06-12· cited 107×
• Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-02-11· cited 94×
• Kimmel v. Peterson
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-05-27· cited 74×
• Perez, John T. v. Dana Corporation, Parish Frame Division and United Steelworkers of America, Local Union No. 3733
  Third Circuit· 1983-09-28· cited 70×
• McGann v. Ernst & Young
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 68×
• Wilson v. Block
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-05-20· cited 66×
• Eclipse Medical, Inc. v. American Hydro-Surgical Instruments, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 1999-01-20· cited 59×
• KMS Restaurant Corp. v. Wendy's International, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-03-04· cited 57×
• Ad-Vantage Telephone Directory Consultants, Inc., Cross v. Gte Directories Corporation, Cross-Appellee
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-09-04· cited 56×
• Hannah Finkel v. Docutel/olivetti Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-05-27· cited 53×
• Genet Co. v. Annheuser-Busch, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-16· cited 53×
• Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1986-01-15· cited 51×
• Jackson v. City of Bloomfield
  Tenth Circuit· 1984-03-30· cited 50×
• State of Louisiana v. Testbank
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-02-11· cited 45×

Other cases named Balter v. Ethyl Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Balter v. Ethyl Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-08