Skip to main content
· 5/27/1987

Hannah Finkel v. Docutel/olivetti Corporation

Citations

  • 817 F.2d 356
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2692
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the fraud on the market presumption \constructs an environment which is hospitable to the reliance presumption of Affiliated Ute” and that the two presumptions \interact”
  • “A court must, therefore, analytically characterize a 10b-5 action as either primarily a nondisclosure case (which would make the presumption applicable), or a positive misrepresentation case.”
  • “the Affiliated Ute presumption and the ‘fraud on the market’ theory ... interact.”
  • “Cases involving primarily a failure to disclose implicate the first and third subsections of Rule 10b — 5; cases involving primarily a misstatement or a failure to state a fact necessary to make the statements made not misleading implicate the second subsection .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Davis, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.