Genet Co. v. Annheuser-Busch, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a company cannot be liable for tortious interference as a matter of law where a wholesaler agreement was expressly conditioned upon the company’s approval
• stating that “a cause of action for tortious interference does not exist against one who is himself a party to the business relationship allegedly interfered with”
• \[A] cause of action for tortious interference does not exist against one who is himself a party to the business relationship allegedly interfered with.\
• a claim for tortious interference requires intentional acts by a third party that interfere with the employment relationship between the plaintiff and his employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).