Skip to main content
· 5/10/1985

G.M. Brod & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 759 F.2d 1526
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 100
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the federal interest statute governs the award of post- judgment interest instead of the Florida interest statute
  • holding that the federal interest statute governs the award of post-judgment interest instead of the Florida interest statute
  • finding that postjudgmept interest should be awarded on the entire amount of the judgment, including award of prejudgment interest
  • observing that the improper means of “misrepresentations” may include a false statement or omission of material fact
  • upholding jury verdict awarding lost profits notwithstanding defendant’s argument that the testimony of plaintiffs expert on the subject was speculative and based on faulty assumptions
  • upholding jury verdict awarding lost profits notwithstanding defendant’s argument that the testimony of plaintiff’s expert on the subject was speculative and based on faulty assumptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dyer, Fay, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.