Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/30/2010
Balicki v. Balicki
Citations
- 4 A.3d 654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no abuse of discretion when trial court sua sponte considered tax ramifications of alimony award when it was not raised in either parties’ exceptions
- stating, issue waived for failure to raise it in Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement
- approving of trial court’s explanation that Divorce Code “requires us only to consider the tax ramifications and expense of sale along with numerous other listed factors, but the Divorce Code does not make a deduction for them mandatory”
- Divorce Code does not make deduction for tax ramifications mandatory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Cleland, Colville
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carney, K. v. Carney, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-11· cited 75×
- Cook, R. v. Cook, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-05-04· cited 48×
- Brubaker v. BrubakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-18· cited 38×
- Kent v. KentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-18· cited 10×
- Llaurado, M. v. Garcia-ZapataSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-13· cited 10×
- Leicht, D. v. Leicht, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-30· cited 4×
- Llaurado, M. v. Garcia-Zapata, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-13· cited 3×
- Carney, K. v. Carney, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-31
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stamerro v. StamerroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-21· cited 146×
- Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-14· cited 127×
- Teodorski v. TeodorskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-12· cited 98×
- Schenk v. SchenkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-19· cited 97×
- Xinda Wang v. Zhiping FengSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-13· cited 56×
- Dalrymple v. KilishekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-23· cited 55×
- Miller v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-31· cited 55×
- Jayne v. JayneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-20· cited 46×
- Hovis v. HovisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 44×
- Cobbs v. SEPTASuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-18· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.