Skip to main content
· 8/12/2004

Teodorski v. Teodorski

Citations

  • 857 A.2d 194
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 313
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion where the trial court had a “reasonable rationale” for its decision to award Wife less money for counsel fees than the Master recommended
  • listing many of the subsection 3701(b) factors as mandatory considerations
  • alimony following divorce is a secondary remedy and is available only where economic justice and the reasonable needs of the parties cannot be achieved by way of an equitable distribution award and development of an appropriate employable skill
  • findings of fact reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Olszewski, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.