Schenk v. Schenk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “It is not the duty of the Superior Court to scour the record and act as appellant’s counsel.”
• noting that wife was entitled to APL during the pendency of the appeal on the equitable distribution matters, and upon this Court’s resolution of the appeal APL would cease
• stating that the circumstances of the case must be measured against the objective of effectuating economic justice between the parties to achieve a just determination of their property rights
• examining equitable distribution award as a whole to determine trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding wife 60% of marital property
• “It is not the duty of the Superior Court to scour the record and act as appellant’s counsel.”
• “[A]n award of equitable distribution is appealable where a divorce Decree is entered while an appeal is pending.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).