Skip to main content
· 11/18/2009

Cobbs v. SEPTA

Citations

  • 985 A.2d 249
  • 2009 Pa. Super. 221
  • 2009 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4468
  • 2009 WL 3839077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issue not explicitly raised in an appellant’s statement of the questions involved is waived
  • holding that issues not explicitly raised in appellant’s statement of the questions involved are waived
  • holding that issue was not explicitly raised in statement of the questions involved is waived
  • holding issue not included in statement of errors is waived
  • issue not included in appellant’s statement of matters complained of on appeal was waived, citing Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii)
  • “Any issue going to the subject matter of a court to act in a particular matter is an issue that cannot be foreclosed by agreement, estoppel, or waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orie Melvin, Bowes and Donohue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.