Fourth Circuit· 8/19/1994
Balazs v. Liebenthal
Citations
- 32 F.3d 151
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 22600
- 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,253
- 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 993
- 1994 WL 446030
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a retaliation claim failed because the EEOC charge had “nothing to do with his race, color, religion, sex or national origin”
- noting that defendant is prejudiced when it has to defend in court against charge that was never verified
- finding once a right to sue letter has issued, there is no longer a charge pending before the EEOC
- finding once a right to sue letter has issued, there is no longer a charge pending before the EEOC
- “that [plaintiff] had been accused of doing something— sexually harassing his co-workers—which he did not do” had “nothing to do with his race, color, religion, sex or 15 national origin”
- “An allegation that he was falsely accused of conduct which, if true, might have given rise to a claim of employment discrimination based on sex by someone else in no way states a cause of action that plaintiff himself was a victim of discrimination based on his sex.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carolina, Dupree, Eastern, MacKenzie, Michael, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kathleen Buck v. The Hampton Township School District Lawrence C. Korchnak, DrThird Circuit· 2006-06-30· cited 1,009×
- Chazz Roberts v. Glenn Industrial Group, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2021-05-21· cited 278×
- Timothy A. Slagle v. County of Clarion Clarion County JailThird Circuit· 2006-01-12· cited 187×
- Tinsley v. First Union National BankFourth Circuit· 1998-09-02· cited 118×
- Gad v. Kansas State UniversityTenth Circuit· 2015-05-27· cited 97×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1998-07-31· cited 78×
- Colburn P. RANDEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, John H. Dalton, Secretary, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1998-10-15· cited 66×
- Gonsalves v. Nissan Motor Corp. in Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-18· cited 66×
- Leonard Edelman v. Lynchburg CollegeFourth Circuit· 2002-08-19· cited 63×
- D'ANNA v. M/a-com, Inc.D. Maryland· 1995-10-12· cited 43×
- Leonard Edelman v. Lynchburg CollegeFourth Circuit· 2000-10-11· cited 37×
- Cooper v. Xerox Corp.W.D. New York· 1998-02-05· cited 19×
- Flippo v. American Home Products Corp.E.D. Virginia· 1999-08-09· cited 13×
- Lane v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.D. Maryland· 1999-09-01· cited 12×
- Blum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-07-17· cited 11×
- Foreman v. WeinsteinD. Maryland· 2007-03-27· cited 11×
- Kendall v. DonahoeW.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-12-21· cited 10×
- Chappell v. School Board of the City of Virginia BeachE.D. Virginia· 1998-07-20· cited 9×
- Richard Shore, M.D. v. The Children's Mercy Hospital and Dr. Gerald WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-12-22· cited 8×
- Merchant v. Prince George's CountyD. Maryland· 2013-05-31· cited 7×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksFifth Circuit· 1969-03-28· cited 309×
- Patterson v. American Tobacco Co.Fourth Circuit· 1976-02-23· cited 182×
- Nathaniel HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW BERN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1987-03-19· cited 154×
- Stephen D. Learned v. City of BellevueNinth Circuit· 1988-11-03· cited 117×
- Needham Holder v. City of Raleigh Jack C. Duncan, Needham Holder v. City of Raleigh Jack C. DuncanFourth Circuit· 1989-02-14· cited 110×
- Margaret PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1982-09-27· cited 108×
- Harold PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1989-12-27· cited 68×
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1981-05-27· cited 51×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1989-12-28· cited 29×
- Rogers v. McCallDistrict of Columbia· 1980-03-20· cited 18×
- Mitchell v. VisserD. Kansas· 1981-12-17· cited 14×
- United States v. University of MarylandD. Maryland· 1977-09-12· cited 9×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1978-01-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.