Needham Holder v. City of Raleigh Jack C. Duncan, Needham Holder v. City of Raleigh Jack C. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We are not persuaded that a preference for family members is inevitably the flip side of racial animus for purposes of federal law.\
• “To hold that favoritism toward friends and relatives is per se violative of Title VII would be, in effect, to rewrite federal law.”
• “We have held that Title VII is not an exclusive remedy for employment discrimination by a public entity. A state employee may still bring a Fourteenth Amendment challenge under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to discriminatory employment decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).