· 5/27/1981
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-Appellee
Citations
- 650 F.2d 14
- 25 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1338
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12862
- 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “framework” for conciliation must allow a “fair opportunity” for the parties to conciliate the disputed claims
- addressing the question in a related context and in dicta, suggests that regulation should be read to treat failure to swear a charge as a technical defect curable by amendment
- EEOC suit dismissed for lack of fair opportunity in advance of action to \discuss (challenged) practices\ at two of national chain's stores
- “Although in general the [EEOC] should be given wide latitude in shaping [conciliation efforts], the [EEOC]’s discretion is not unlimited ....” (citation omitted)
- “Although in general the [EEOC] should be given wide latitude in shaping [conciliation efforts], the [EEOC]’s discretion is not unlimited .... ” (citation omitted)
- EEOC suit dismissed for lack of fair opportunity in advance of action to “discuss [challenged] practices” at two of national chain’s stores
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mansfield, Newman, Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.