Skip to main content
· 8/9/1999

Flippo v. American Home Products Corp.

Citations

  • 59 F. Supp. 2d 572
  • 10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1372
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12282
  • 1999 WL 606892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurisdiction in federal court is proper where plaintiff checked box and EEOC transmitted charge but VCHR declined to investigate
  • “in Virginia, a written statement of facts lacking any citation to specific state statutes is sufficient to commence proceedings under state law”
  • “in Virginia, a written statement of facts lacking any citation to specific state statutes is sufficient to commence proceedings under state law”
  • “Because they are ‘substantively identical statutes,’ the Court analyzes the ADA and VHRA discrimination claims together.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.