· 8/9/1999
Flippo v. American Home Products Corp.
Citations
- 59 F. Supp. 2d 572
- 10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1372
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12282
- 1999 WL 606892
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that jurisdiction in federal court is proper where plaintiff checked box and EEOC transmitted charge but VCHR declined to investigate
- “in Virginia, a written statement of facts lacking any citation to specific state statutes is sufficient to commence proceedings under state law”
- “in Virginia, a written statement of facts lacking any citation to specific state statutes is sufficient to commence proceedings under state law”
- “Because they are ‘substantively identical statutes,’ the Court analyzes the ADA and VHRA discrimination claims together.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard L. Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.