Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the district court’s denial of a motion to intervene was proper where the main action was dismissed
• explaining that “[e]quitable tolling is premised on the ‘excusable neglect’ of the filing party” and that it “preserves a claim after the filing period has expired” (citation omitted)
• tolling is appropriate if “a claimant has received inadequate notice” or was “lulled . . . into inaction” by “affirmative misconduct on the part of a defendant”
• filing of timely EEOC charge is subject to estoppel and equitable tolling
• equitable tolling may be appropriate where “the court has led the plaintiff to believe that ... she has done everything required of ... her”
• requirement of filing timely charge with EEOC is subject to waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling; equitable tolling is premised on excusable neglect of filing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).