Skip to main content
· 12/20/1994

Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners

Citations

  • 525 N.W.2d 559
  • 1994 Minn. App. LEXIS 1271
  • 1994 WL 705343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process does not attach during the investigatory proceedings of the Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners
  • holding that due process does not attach during the investigatory proceedings of the Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners
  • holding that due process does not attach during the investigatory proceedings of the Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners
  • concluding that physician’s protected interest in medical license was not implicated by investigatory proceeding because physician “face[d] no potential discipline until the board beg[an] formal adjudicatory proceedings”
  • finding that the preliminary examination order did not implicate a federally protected liberty or property interest
  • finding under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause that no protected interest was implicated by the medical board’s preliminary examination order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Short, Kalitowski, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.