Skip to main content

Hull v. State

Citations

  • 839 N.E.2d 1250
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2456
  • 2005 WL 3556706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a harsher penalty supported by newly discovered evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Baker, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.