Skip to main content

Hart v. State

Citations

  • 829 N.E.2d 541
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1041
  • 2005 WL 1364369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an enhancement is appropriate due to impact on victim only if it is demonstrated that the crime had a destructive impact not normally associated with the offense
  • “Abusing a position of trust is, by itself, a valid aggravator which supports the maximum enhancement of a sentence for child molesting.”
  • “There is no greater position of trust than that of a parent to his own young child.”
  • consecutive sentences appropriate for separate and distinct criminal acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Baker, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.