Jose Guzman v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no abuse of discretion in refusing to find mitigators where they are disputable in nature, weight, or significance
• providing that one’s status as an illegal immigrant may be considered to be a valid aggravating factor at sentencing because said status demonstrates a disregard for the law, including immigration laws
• “It is well-settled that a single aggravating factor is sufficient to warrant an enhanced sentence.”
• a single aggravating factor is sufficient to warrant an enhanced sentence
• “a single aggravating factor is sufficient to warrant an enhanced sentence”
• letter of medical expenses sufficient to prove loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).