Skip to main content
D. Maine· 11/15/2018

Baber v. Dunlap

Citations

  • 349 F. Supp. 3d 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying a motion for a TRO, in part, because “[p]laintiffs have not provided the [c]ourt with any reasoned argumentation, supported by citation to authority, on the specific topic of why the remedy they propose is the remedy they are entitled to”
  • “for this Court to change the rules of the election, after the votes have been cast, could well offend due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Baber v. Dunlap

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.