Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Monroig-Zayas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he party seeking the preliminary injunction bears the burden of demonstrating that these four factors weigh in its favor”
• “if the moving party cannot demonstrate that he is likely to succeed in his quest,” preliminary injunctive relief is properly denied without further analysis
• “if the moving party cannot demonstrate that he is likely to succeed in his quest,” preliminary injunctive relief is properly denied without further analysis
• the “sine qua non ... is likelihood of success on the merits”
• “ ‘The sine qua non of this four-part inquiry is likelihood of success on the merits: if the moving party cannot demonstrate that he is likely to succeed in his quest, the remaining factors become matters of idle curiosity.’ ”
• “[I]f the moving party cannot demonstrate that he is likely to succeed in his quest, the remaining factors become matters of idle curiosity.” (quoting New Comm Wireless Servs., Inc. v. SprintCom, Inc., 287 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).