Supreme Court· 6/18/2018

Besinek v. Lamone

Citations

585 U.S. 155
138 S. Ct. 1942
201 L. Ed. 2d 398
2018 U.S. LEXIS 3688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “plaintiffs’ unnecessary, years-long delay in asking for preliminary injunctive relief weighed against their request”
noting that “a preliminary injunction is ‘an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right’”
noting that “a preliminary injunction is ‘an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right’”
noting that “a preliminary injunction is ‘an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right’”
explaining that district courts must consider whether the plaintiffs “[are] likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, [whether] the balance of equities tips in [their] favor, and [whether] an injunction is in the public interest”
noting that “a party requesting a preliminary injunction must generally show reasonable diligence” and the “plaintiffs’ unnecessary, years-long delay in asking for preliminary injunctive relief weighed against their request” for preliminary injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.