S.D. New York· 10/10/2012
Authors Guild, Inc. v. Hathitrust
Citations
- 902 F. Supp. 2d 445
- 104 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1659
- 2012 WL 4808939
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Article III of the Constitution limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts to eases or controversies of sufficient immediacy and reality and not hypothetical or abstract disputes.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “Article III of the Constitution limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts to cases or controversies of sufficient immediacy and reality and not hypothetical or abstract disputes.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaS.D. New York· 2013-01-04· cited 44×
- In Re Dell Inc., Securities LitigationW.D. Texas· 2008-10-07· cited 23×
- Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-11-14· cited 12×
- Port Auth. Police Benevolent Ass'n, Inc. v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.S.D. Illinois· 2017-10-24· cited 10×
- Authors Guild, Inc. v. HathiTrustSecond Circuit· 2014-06-10
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 4,065×
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2000-01-12· cited 2,790×
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 2,678×
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-01· cited 1,837×
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court· 1996-03-19· cited 1,806×
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 1,191×
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 978×
- L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLCSecond Circuit· 2011-06-01· cited 802×
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 662×
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 629×
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2001-02-12· cited 489×
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Second Circuit· 1988-03-23· cited 400×
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-03· cited 333×
- Stewart v. AbendSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 321×
- Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc. v. Carol Publishing Group, Inc., Defendant-Cross Claimant-Appellant, Beth B. Golub, Defendant-CrossSecond Circuit· 1998-07-10· cited 296×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.