W.D. Washington· 7/31/2014
Authentify Patent Co. v. Strikeforce Technologies, Inc.
Citations
- 39 F. Supp. 3d 1135
- 2014 WL 3767480
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105655
Judges: Martinez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court· 1964-03-30· cited 3,077×
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 2,878×
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-12-07· cited 2,624×
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 1,092×
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-05-03· cited 723×
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 1994-03-08· cited 346×
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerFederal Circuit· 1995-01-20· cited 241×
- Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, and the Regents of the University of CaliforniaFederal Circuit· 1993-09-23· cited 188×
- Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Jan R. Coyle and Kolbet LabsFederal Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 177×
- Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Abbyy Software HouseFederal Circuit· 2010-11-12· cited 166×
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc., Aaroflex, Inc. And Albert C. YoungFederal Circuit· 1998-11-12· cited 161×
- Inamed Corporation, Inamed Development Company and Bioenterics Corporation v. Lubomyr I. KuzmakFederal Circuit· 2001-05-15· cited 155×
- Rotec Industries, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corporation, Tucker Associates, Inc. And Garry Tucker, and Mitsubishi International CorporationFederal Circuit· 2000-06-13· cited 148×
- Silent Drive, Inc. v. Strong Industries, Inc. And Brooks StrongFederal Circuit· 2003-04-16· cited 145×
- Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2012-05-31· cited 138×
- Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations FoundationFederal Circuit· 2002-07-23· cited 120×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.