3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc., Aaroflex, Inc. And Albert C. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant purposefully directed its activities at the forum state by “solicit[ing] orders,” although not in the Internet context
• concluding that a defendant who sent promotional letters and price quotations to residents of the forum state purposefully directed its activities at those residents
• holding that defendant’s maintenance of a website viewable in the forum state and e-mail responses were insufficient to establish purposeful availment
• holding that Federal Circuit law applies to personal jurisdiction over state law claims where the \resolution of the patent infringement issue\ would be a \significant factor\ in resolving those state law claims
• holding that an offer to sell exists under the patent statute if the communication contains both (1) the description of the product, and (2) a price at which it can be purchased
• concluding that Aarotech purposefully directed activities at residents of California when it “sent promotional letters, solicited orders for models, sent videos and sample parts, and issued price quotations to residents of California.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).