Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Fourteenth Amendment “minimum contacts” standard “articulated in International Shoe . . . and its progeny” applies in “Fifth Amendment due process cases”
• holding that, in absence of evidentiary hearing regarding |urisidiction, “all factual disputes must be resolved in [plaintiff's] favor in order to evaluate its prima facie showing of jurisdiction”
• observing that a forum state “has a substantial interest in preventing patent infringement within its borders”
• finding that the burden of subjecting Canadian defendants to litigation in Kansas “is relatively minimal”
• determining that telephone calls, letters, and two in-person meetings in the forum state for purposes of nego- tiating a license agreement “constitute[d] sufficient mini- mum contacts”
• determining that telephone calls, letters, and two in-person meetings in the forum state for purposes of nego- tiating a license agreement “constitute[d] sufficient mini- mum contacts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).