Auer v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying, in part, on definitions established in prior opinions to interpret a statute
• first quoting Shooltz v. Shooltz, 27 Va. App. 264, 271, 498 S.E.2d 437, 441 (1998), then quoting Rollins v. Commonwealth, 37 Va. App. 73, 79, 554 S.E.2d 99, 102 (2001)
• relying in part on definitions in prior case decisions
• relying in part on definitions in prior cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).