· 3/12/2013
Andrew McQuay Jacobs v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Citations
- 61 Va. App. 529
- 738 S.E.2d 519
- 2013 WL 878912
- 2013 Va. App. LEXIS 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the remaining balance of a defendant’s original sentence “did not simply disappear” when the trial court revoked a portion of his suspended sentence
- interpreting the trial court’s order based on the principle that trial judges are presumed to know the law and statutory procedural requirements
- “Appellant admitted the violation, and [the judge] revoked ninety days of appellant’s previously suspended sentence . . . .”
- “It is clear that -4- [w]hen a court revokes the suspension of execution of sentence, the original sentence shall be in full force and effect.” (alteration in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beales
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.