Skip to main content
· 3/12/2013

Andrew McQuay Jacobs v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Citations

  • 61 Va. App. 529
  • 738 S.E.2d 519
  • 2013 WL 878912
  • 2013 Va. App. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the remaining balance of a defendant’s original sentence “did not simply disappear” when the trial court revoked a portion of his suspended sentence
  • interpreting the trial court’s order based on the principle that trial judges are presumed to know the law and statutory procedural requirements
  • “Appellant admitted the violation, and [the judge] revoked ninety days of appellant’s previously suspended sentence . . . .”
  • “It is clear that -4- [w]hen a court revokes the suspension of execution of sentence, the original sentence shall be in full force and effect.” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.