Timbers v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Commonwealth is “barred on double jeopardy grounds from retrying” an appellant where this Court “reverse[s] for insufficiency of the evidence”
• discussing sufficiency of the evidence due to requirements of Double Jeopardy Clause
• discussion of evidentiary sufficiency required by Double Jeopardy Clause in cases remanded for other error
• discussion of evidentiary sufficiency required by Double Jeopardy Clause in cases remanded for other error
• addressing sufficiency after reversing on a Miranda violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).