Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen Tanzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Contractual language that refers to the transaction as a ‘purchase,’ for example, . . . indicates that the transaction is for goods rather than services.”
• “Contractual language that . . . identifies the parties as the ‘buyer’ and ‘seller,’ indicates that the transaction is for goods rather than services.”
• categorizing representations that certain products were “superior” as puffery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).