Snyder v. Herbert Greenbaum & Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contract to furnish and install over 17,000 yards of carpet in 228 apartments was predominately a sale of goods
• carpet supplier’s estimate of how much carpet needed for job was not misrepresentation justifying rescission of contract
• carpet supplier's estimate of how much carpet needed for job was not misrepresentation justifying rescission of contract
• \`course of dealing' is an interpretative device to give meaning to the words and terms of an agreement\
• under this theory, “the original sale and the second sale are independent events”
• primary thrust of contract was the sale rather than the installation of carpet

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Parker v. Columbia Bank
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-14· cited 134×
• Luria Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Pielet Brothers Scrap Iron & Metal, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-06-18· cited 63×
• First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-17· cited 57×
• Coakley & Williams, Inc. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp.
  Fourth Circuit· 1983-04-21· cited 54×
• Bitterroot International Systems, Ltd. v. Western Star Trucks, Inc.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 46×
• Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1983-06-10· cited 45×
• Anthony Pools v. Sheehan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-25· cited 42×
• Teradyne, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc., Teradyne, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1982-03-30· cited 36×
• Audio Visual Associates, Incorporated, T/a Ritz Audio Visual Associates, Incorporated v. Sharp Electronics Corporation, and Douglas Stewart Company
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-04-20· cited 32×
• DeGroft v. Lancaster Silo Co.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-13· cited 32×
• Markey v. Wolf
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-28· cited 32×
• Western Pioneer, Inc. v. Harbor Enterprises, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-10-11· cited 31×
• Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen Tanzer
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2012-12-26· cited 30×
• R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Diasonics, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-08-13· cited 28×
• Autonumerics, Inc. v. Bayer Industries, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-09-04· cited 25×
• Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Gironda
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-07-29· cited 24×
• Apex LLC v. Sharing World, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-05-31· cited 23×
• Bill's Coal Company, Inc. v. Board Of Public Utilities Of Springfield, Missouri
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-10-06· cited 19×
• Unique Designs, Inc. v. Pittard MacHinery Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-06-28· cited 19×
• Arb (American Research Bureau), Inc. v. E-Systems, Inc., Arb (American Research Bureau), Inc. v. E-Systems, Inc
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-12-12· cited 18×