Skip to main content

Jiron v. Mahlab

Citations

  • 659 P.2d 311
  • 99 N.M. 425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that right of access to courts is guaranteed by United States Constitution
  • stating that in most circumstances Section 41-5-13 is constitutional
  • declaring unconstitutional a New Mexico statute providing for a review panel, in light of a similar constitutional provision, as applied to the circumstances of the case
  • declaring unconstitutional a New Mexico statute providing for a review panel, in light of a similar constitutional provision, as applied to the circumstances of the case
  • where requirement of Act causes undue delay prejudicing plaintiff, right of access to courts is unconstitutionally deprived
  • where requirement of Act causes undue delay prejudicing plaintiff, right of access to courts is unconstitutionally deprived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Payne, Federici, Riordan, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.