New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/29/1981
T.W.I.W., Inc. v. Rhudy
Citations
- 630 P.2d 753
- 96 N.M. 354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that notice of termination, when coupled with offer to remain at increased rental, is insufficient to terminate tenancy
- holding that termination notice set for period shorter than thirty days only took effect at the end of rental period following thirty-day interval
- noting that the UORRA 15 is remedial and in derogation of the common law
- “[Regulations] must be construed so that no part of the [regulation] is rendered surplusage, if possible.”
- notice to quit on date other than anniversary date effective on next ensuing anniversary date
- courts should avoid construing statute so as to render part of it surplusage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Federici, Easley, Sosa, Payne, Riordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marckstadt v. Lockheed Martin Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-11-19· cited 66×
- Whitely v. New Mexico State Personnel BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-04-01· cited 61×
- Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-10-04· cited 46×
- Harry's Village, Inc. v. Egg Harbor TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-06-07· cited 41×
- Western Investors Life Insurance v. New Mexico Life Insurance GuarantyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-10-17· cited 33×
- Newcum v. LawsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-05-17· cited 26×
- Economy Rentals, Inc. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-24· cited 25×
- Board of Education of Alamogordo Public Schools District No. 1 v. JenningsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-02· cited 14×
- Aragon v. State Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-12-12· cited 14×
- First Baptist Church of Roswell v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-02-20· cited 12×
- State v. JULIA S.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-04-24· cited 10×
- Garcia v. ThongNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 10×
- Steffen v. PaulusAppellate Court of Illinois· 1984-06-27· cited 10×
- Armijo Ex Rel. Armijo v. Regents of the University of New MexicoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-08· cited 8×
- Clark v. SiderisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-12-20· cited 7×
- Dickens v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-04-23· cited 6×
- Carol Rickert & Associates v. LawNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-06-25· cited 5×
- Cheng v. RabeyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2022-10-31· cited 5×
- Klein v. Bronstein (In Re Klein)D. New Mexico· 1984-04-10· cited 4×
- Annex Properties, LLC v. TNS Research InternationalEighth Circuit· 2013-04-01· cited 3×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-09-26· cited 115×
- Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. TerrelNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-08-04· cited 104×
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-03-23· cited 80×
- Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-01-02· cited 69×
- Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-11-12· cited 55×
- Arnold v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 40×
- Albuquerque Hilton Inn v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Rio Rancho Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-02-03· cited 20×
- Eastern Navajo Industries, Inc. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-06-29· cited 12×
- Lund v. OzanneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1906-01-11· cited 9×
- Barham v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-08-29· cited 8×
- Kester v. Disan Engineering Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1979-02-22· cited 6×
- Flanagan v. LazerineMissouri Court of Appeals· 1913-06-03· cited 5×
- Spencer v. FaulknerCivil Court of the City of New York· 1971-01-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.