State v. Apache

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was substantial evidence that the 17 defendant was a fugitive when a warrant was issued and placed in the NCIC database 18 and the defendant admitted to absconding from supervision and changing residences 19 without permission
• holding that 16 “the judicial determination of fugitive status shall be made only after the probationer 17 has been found and brought before the court, regardless of whether this occurs before 18 or after the date on which probation was originally to have expired”
• stating that a “judicial determination of fugitive 11 status shall be made only after the probationer has been found and brought before the 12 court, regardless of whether this occurs before or after the date on which probation 13 was originally to have expired”
• tolling the probationary period while the probationer is 8 a fugitive from justice
• tolling the probationary period while the probationer is a fugitive from justice
• providing 3 that it would be “a violation of constitutional due process[] for a trial court to revoke 4 a probationer’s probation, in absentia, when the probationer has absconded from the 5 jurisdiction (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).